Skip to main content

Organic apples aren't necessarily better for soil, study finds

2 min read
Australia
4 views✓ Verified Source
Share

You probably assumed that organic apple orchards had healthier, more biodiverse soil than conventional ones. A new study in South Australia suggests you might want to reconsider that assumption.

Researchers compared soil samples from eight orchards—four certified organic for seven years or more, four conventional—expecting to find clear differences in microbial diversity and abundance. Instead, they found the soils were remarkably similar. The types of microbes differed slightly (organic plots had more dung saprotrophs, fungi that feed on decaying matter), but when it came to overall diversity and abundance, the two systems looked almost identical.

The real surprise came when researchers compared both farmed soils to native, unfarmed soil from the surrounding area. Native soils actually had lower microbial and fungal biodiversity than either farming method. This flipped the researchers' expectations entirely—the organic orchards were more similar to conventional ones than to the "natural" baseline.

Wait—What is Brightcast?

We're a new kind of news feed.

Regular news is designed to drain you. We're a non-profit built to restore you. Every story we publish is scored for impact, progress, and hope.

Start Your News Detox

What's really going on

The researchers think the answer lies in history. All eight orchards had been farmed conventionally at some point. That legacy appears to linger in the soil even after years of organic management. More tellingly, farmers across both organic and conventional sites were using overlapping techniques: mulching, green manuring (growing legumes and plowing them back in to add nitrogen), and other shared practices. The binary divide between "organic" and "conventional" is blurrier than the labels suggest.

This doesn't mean organic farming is pointless—it just means the organic label alone doesn't guarantee soil health. A conventional farm using green manuring and careful soil management might be doing more for microbial life than an organic operation relying on the certification alone.

The study is small (eight orchards in one region, one crop type), so it's not a verdict on all organic agriculture. But it does suggest we're asking the wrong question. Instead of assuming organic automatically wins on ecology, we might focus on specific practices—whether they're used on organic or conventional land—that actually rebuild soil life. That's harder than reading a label, but it's closer to the truth.

42
ModerateLocal or limited impact

Brightcast Impact Score

The article presents a scientific study that challenges the assumption that organic farming practices always lead to superior soil conditions compared to conventional farming. While the study found some differences in soil microbes, the overall diversity and abundance of soil organisms were similar between organic and conventional orchards. This suggests that organic labels do not necessarily indicate ecological superiority, providing a more nuanced perspective on the impacts of organic farming.

15

Hope

Moderate

11

Reach

Moderate

16

Verified

Solid

Wall of Hope

0/50

Be the first to share how this story made you feel

How does this make you feel?

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
Share

Originally reported by Anthropocene Magazine · Verified by Brightcast

Get weekly positive news in your inbox

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Join thousands who start their week with hope.

More stories that restore faith in humanity