The planet got a little help

Norway pauses deep-sea mining for four years in policy U-turn

9 min readMongabay
Norway
Norway pauses deep-sea mining for four years in policy U-turn
83
...
6

Norway has closed the door to deep-sea mining in its waters until at least 2029, stopping an industry that had been on the cusp of launching in spite the environmental risks it presented. 3, Norway’s five political parties supporting the new government debated the fiscal budget. They agreed that the government would not launch the first round of deep-sea mineral licensing, which had been tentatively set for 2026. The parties also decided to cut public funding for state-led seabed mineral mapping efforts.

Two days later, on Dec. 5, the decision to pause deep-sea mining efforts was officially voted on in parliament, reversing the previous decision to push forward with the industry.

Lars Haltbrekken, a member of the Norwegian parliament for the Socialist Left Party, said he was satisfied with the decision. The Socialist Left Party played a major role last year in stopping the previously planned deep-sea mining licensing round. “I m happy that we managed to stop it again, and I hope that we now have stopped it for good,” Haltbrekken told Mongabay. “The reason is that there are huge environmental risks by starting deep-sea mining.” Snorre Erichsen Skjevrak, a state secretary for the Norwegian Ministry of Energy, which was overseeing deep-sea mining plans, acknowledged the pause but said the “budget agreement is a political compromise that does not affect the regulatory framework or management strategy for seabed minerals.” “Our policy is unchanged,” Skjevrak told Mongabay in an email.

“Our objective is to facilitate the possibility of future,...This article was originally published on Mongabay

Brightcast Impact Score (BIS)

83/100Groundbreaking

This article highlights a positive development where Norway has paused deep-sea mining in its waters for at least four years, reversing its previous plans to push forward with the industry. This decision was made due to concerns over the environmental risks posed by deep-sea mining. The article provides details on the political process behind this decision, indicating that it was a collaborative effort involving multiple political parties. This decision is seen as a constructive solution to address the environmental concerns associated with deep-sea mining, and it represents measurable progress in environmental protection.

Hope Impact33/33

Emotional uplift and inspirational potential

Reach Scale25/33

Potential audience impact and shareability

Verification25/33

Source credibility and content accuracy

Significant positive development

Comments(0)

Join the conversation and share your perspective.

Sign In to Comment
Loading comments...

Get weekly positive news in your inbox

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Join thousands who start their week with hope.

More stories that restore faith in humanity

North America's 'largest wildlife overpass' is finally complete. It's expected to reduce wildlife-vehicle crashes by 90%
Environment
1 wks ago
Solar-lit fishing nets cut sea turtle bycatch by 63%, Mexico trials show
Environment
0 months ago