Nourishing news

Your Dinner Might Be Fueling Climate Change

Humanity's food habits are fueling climate change in alarming ways. Curbing food waste and beef intake could be vital to keeping global temperatures in check.

33 min readSciTechDaily
British Columbia, Canada
Your Dinner Might Be Fueling Climate Change
60
...
4

Why it matters: reducing food waste and shifting to more sustainable diets can help mitigate climate change and create a healthier, more sustainable future for people around the world.

Steak and French Fries Dinner

Food choices are driving climate change more than many people realize. Cutting waste and reducing beef consumption could help keep global warming in check.

For many people, the holidays often bring plenty of indulgent meals, followed by guilt and firm New Year’s resolutions to eat better.

A new study from the University of British Columbia suggests that moderation should not be limited to one season. The research found that 44 percent of people worldwide would need to change what they eat if global warming is to be held below 2 °C.

The study was led by Dr. Juan Diego Martinez during his doctoral work at UBC’s Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability. He explains what the research revealed and outlines practical diet changes that could help reduce climate risks.

What did you find?

The analysis shows that about half of the global population, and at least 90 percent of Canadians, would need to adjust their diets to avoid the most severe levels of planetary warming. Martinez notes that this estimate is cautious because the study relied on data from 2012. Since that time, both greenhouse gas emissions and the global population have continued to grow. Projections for 2050 indicate that roughly 90 percent of people will need to eat differently.

The researchers examined data from 112 countries, representing 99 percent of food-related greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. Each country’s population was divided into 10 income groups. The team then calculated a food emissions budget for each person by combining emissions from food consumption, global food production, and supply chains. These totals were compared with the maximum emissions the planet can sustain if warming is to stay below 2 °C.

Why focus on dietary changes rather than, say, flying less?

Food systems account for more than one-third of all greenhouse gas emissions caused by human activity.

The study found that the top 15 percent of food-related emitters are responsible for 30 percent of total food emissions. That amount matches the combined emissions of the bottom 50 percent of the population. This high-emitting group is made up of the wealthiest individuals in high-emissions countries, including the Central African Republic, Brazil, and Australia.

While these top emitters contribute heavily, many more people still consume diets that exceed the recommended emissions limit. This is why the issue extends beyond the richest groups. Globally, half the population needs to change their diets. In Canada, all 10 income groups are above the emissions cap.

Discussions about flying less, driving electric, and buying fewer luxury goods are valid: We need to cut emissions anyway we can. However, food emissions are not just a problem for the richest—we all need to eat, so everyone has the ability to make a difference. For people who both fly frequently and eat large amounts of beef, it is not an either/or choice: Reducing both can help.

What changes can we make to our diets?

Start by eating only what you need and finding ways to reuse leftovers. Reducing food waste lowers emissions, cuts down on cooking, and makes meals simpler and more enjoyable.

Another key step is cutting back on beef. In Canada, beef alone accounts for 43 percent of food-related emissions for the average person. Martinez points out that if countries had followed the commitments set out in the Kyoto Protocol, beef consumption might not pose such a challenge today. At this stage, however, food emissions must also decline to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.

Martinez acknowledges that this shift is difficult. He says, “I grew up in Latin America where eating a lot of beef is part of the culture, so I get how much of an ask this is.” Still, he stresses that the evidence is clear and can no longer be ignored.

Using Everyday Choices to Push for Change

He encourages people to “Vote with your fork.” Individual choices are a starting point for broader action. As more people talk openly about how their diets are changing and why it matters, political leaders are more likely to support policies that improve food systems and reduce their climate impact.

Reference: “Dietary GHG emissions from 2.7 billion people already exceed the personal carbon footprint needed to achieve the 2 °C climate goal” by Juan Diego Martinez and Navin Ramankutty, 11 November 2025, Environmental Research: Food Systems.

DOI: 10.1088/2976-601X/ae10c0

Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.

Follow us on Google and Google News.

Brightcast Impact Score (BIS)

60/100Hopeful

This article highlights the positive impact that reducing food waste and beef consumption can have on mitigating climate change. It provides constructive solutions and measurable progress that individuals can take to address an important environmental issue. While the article does mention some negative aspects of current dietary habits, the overall tone is focused on empowering people to make positive changes.

Hope Impact15/33

Emotional uplift and inspirational potential

Reach Scale25/33

Potential audience impact and shareability

Verification20/33

Source credibility and content accuracy

Encouraging positive news

Drop in your group chat

Just read that beef and potatoes account for 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions. www.brightcast.news

Comments(0)

Join the conversation and share your perspective.

Sign In to Comment
Loading comments...

Get weekly positive news in your inbox

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Join thousands who start their week with hope.

More stories that restore faith in humanity