The planet got a little help

What would this scientist tell Trump? Interview with Robert Watson, former chair of the IPCC

9 min readMongabay
Nairobi, Kenya
What would this scientist tell Trump? Interview with Robert Watson, former chair of the IPCC
65
...
1

Why it matters: this report provides authoritative scientific evidence to counter climate disinformation and motivate urgent action to protect the planet and safeguard the health and wellbeing of all people.

President Donald Trump addressed the United Nations General Assembly in late 2025 and dismissed climate change as a “con job”, the scientific community reacted with alarm. Months earlier, The Guardian had reported that his anti-climate agenda could result in 1.3 million additional deaths globally. Prior to that, in August, CNN documented how scientists were coordinating to counter Trump’s attempts to erase credible climate research from the record.

The news was emblematic of a wider trend: The rapid spread of climate disinformation, a resurgence of greenwashing and a global political environment increasingly hostile to science — even as emissions rise, biodiversity collapses and pollution reaches lethal levels. Against that backdrop, the U.N. Environment Program launched another report, which it called a flagship environmental assessment — the Global Environment Outlook 7 (GEO-7) — in Nairobi on Tuesday.

Authored by 287 scientists from 82 countries, the report paints a stark picture: Greenhouse gas emissions continue climbing, 20-40% of global land is degraded, pollution kills 9 million people a year and 1 million species face extinction if current trends continue. Among the co-chairs of GEO-7 is Sir Robert Watson, one of the world’s most respected environmental scientists and a former chair of the IPCC, the U.N.’s top climate science body.

In many ways, he has spent his career trying to ensure science informs political decisions. Watson was in Nairobi this week for the launch of the GEO-7. So, what would he tell a political leader who rejects the science entirely? Mongabay asked...This article was originally published on Mongabay

Brightcast Impact Score (BIS)

65/100Hopeful

This article discusses the challenges of communicating climate science to political leaders who reject the evidence, such as former U.S. President Donald Trump. While the article paints a stark picture of the environmental crisis, it focuses on the work of respected scientist Robert Watson and the launch of the UN's Global Environment Outlook 7 report. The article highlights the importance of science informing political decisions, which aligns with Brightcast's mission to publish stories about people doing good for the planet.

Hope Impact10/33

Emotional uplift and inspirational potential

Reach Scale25/33

Potential audience impact and shareability

Verification30/33

Source credibility and content accuracy

Encouraging positive news

Comments(0)

Join the conversation and share your perspective.

Sign In to Comment
Loading comments...

Get weekly positive news in your inbox

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Join thousands who start their week with hope.

More stories that restore faith in humanity

North America's 'largest wildlife overpass' is finally complete. It's expected to reduce wildlife-vehicle crashes by 90%
Environment
1 wks ago
Solar-lit fishing nets cut sea turtle bycatch by 63%, Mexico trials show
Environment
0 months ago