Turns out, even baseball umpires might have a soft spot for fame. A new study out of the University of Michigan suggests that when South Korea's professional baseball league swapped human umpires for robots to call balls and strikes, something interesting happened: star batters suddenly weren't quite so starry at the plate.
The Robots Are Watching
Since the Korea Baseball Organization (KBO) rolled out its Automated Ball-Strike (ABS) System in 2024, the game has changed, at least for the league's biggest names. Researchers found that once the cameras and pitch-tracking tech took over, high-status hitters saw a noticeable dip in their strike-zone judgment stats. We're talking more strikeouts, fewer walks, and generally less success getting on base compared to their less famous counterparts.
To put a number on it: over 100 at-bats with the ABS system, a star batter logged almost three more strikeouts and nearly two fewer walks than a lesser-known player. Let that satisfyingly specific number sink in.
We're a new kind of news feed.
Regular news is designed to drain you. We're a non-profit built to restore you. Every story we publish is scored for impact, progress, and hope.
Start Your News DetoxJimin Song, the study's lead author, put it plainly: this shift strongly hints at a pre-existing bias. Before the robots, human umpires might have been unconsciously giving those big-name batters the benefit of the doubt on close pitches. Because, apparently, even the most stoic officials are still, well, human.
Before 2024, KBO umpires eyeballed every pitch. Now, technology makes the call, then relays it to the home plate umpire, who, one assumes, just gets to announce the inevitable. To gauge the impact, Song's team stacked 2023 (human calls) against 2024 (robot calls), focusing specifically on how high-status players fared.
Interestingly, star pitchers didn't show the same pattern. Song speculates this could be due to natural performance variability or simply fewer opportunities to demonstrate a similar decline. Or perhaps, no one's that impressed by a good curveball anymore.
Beyond the Diamond
While we're talking baseball, the implications here stretch far beyond the foul lines. Think about it: hiring, promotions, performance reviews. Anywhere human judgment is involved, there's a chance for unconscious bias, giving those with existing high status an unearned leg up. It's the "Matthew Effect" in action – once you're on top, it's easier to stay there.
This study suggests automated systems, or even just more objective processes like blind reviews, could be a powerful tool for leveling competitive playing fields. Because if a robot can make a baseball game fairer, imagine what it could do for your next job interview.
Major League Baseball has also started experimenting with an Automated Ball-Strike Challenge System this year, though a full robot takeover isn't slated just yet. In the KBO, the tech has been largely accepted. In MLB? A bit more debate, which is exactly what you'd expect when tradition meets a perfectly objective square-or-circle-shaped strike zone.
Richard Paulsen, a senior author on the study, doesn't think human officiating will vanish entirely, especially for the squishier, more subjective calls like pass interference in football. But for something as black-and-white (or ball-and-strike) as a pitch? The robots are coming, and they're bringing fairness with them. And probably a lot of eye-rolls from formerly favored sluggers.
