Skip to main content

Scientists Still Don't Know How or When the Grand Canyon Formed. New Research May Hint at Its Ancient Origins

6.6 million years ago, the ancestral Colorado River created an ancient Arizona lake. It then spilled westward, carving the landscape that would become the Grand Canyon.

Lina Chen
Lina Chen
·3 min read·United States·5 views

The Grand Canyon is a famous natural landmark, drawing over four million visitors each year. Despite its popularity, scientists are still unsure exactly how and when this massive gorge was formed.

A New Theory for the Grand Canyon's Origins

New research, published in Science, supports a theory called the "lake spillover" hypothesis. This idea suggests that the ancestral Colorado River created an ancient lake in northern Arizona about 6.6 million years ago.

Once this lake filled up, its water spilled westward. This overflow then began carving out the Grand Canyon along the river's current path. Ryan Crow, a geologist with the U.S. Geological Survey and co-author of the study, called this a "simple but powerful explanation" for how the Colorado River system developed.

Wait—What is Brightcast?

We're a new kind of news feed.

Regular news is designed to drain you. We're a non-profit built to restore you. Every story we publish is scored for impact, progress, and hope.

Start Your News Detox

How Scientists Found the Evidence

Scientists gathered 19 sandstone samples from the Bidahochi Basin, an area east of the Grand Canyon. These samples contained tiny zircon crystals. By measuring the radioactive decay of uranium into lead in these crystals, scientists could determine their age.

Zircon crystals are very durable and act like a river's "fingerprint." Their age and trace elements show where and when they originated. When researchers compared these zircon crystals to known early Colorado River sediments, they found a strong match. This suggests the sandstone in the Bidahochi Basin was once sediment from the Colorado River.

Other evidence, like increased sediment and fossilized fish, also supported this theory.

A map showing a lake and the Colorado River

The data suggests the proto-Colorado River flowed into the basin, forming Lake Bidahochi (also known as Hopi Lake) about 6.6 million years ago. Over hundreds of thousands of years, the lake filled. Eventually, the water rose high enough to spill over the Kaibab Arch, continuing its journey west and carving the Grand Canyon.

While other factors like groundwater or erosion might have played a part, the researchers believe lake spillover was the main way the Colorado River found its current path and created the canyon. Crow noted that even if parts of the Grand Canyon were carved by other rivers, the Colorado River connected them.

Remaining Questions

Some scientists are still cautious about this new interpretation. Rebecca Flowers, a geologist at the University of Colorado Boulder, acknowledged that the lake spillover theory "can explain the data" but noted it doesn't rule out other possibilities. Karl Karlstrom, a geologist at the University of New Mexico, also mentioned that "key details" of the lake spillover idea still need testing.

Despite the debate, these findings might help solve another puzzle. Scientists generally agree the Colorado River existed in western Colorado about 11 million years ago and exited the Grand Canyon around 5.6 million years ago. The new research suggests the river pooled in the Bidahochi Basin about 6.6 million years ago, which could fill part of that timeline gap.

John He, a geologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, and lead author, explained that the new evidence shows the river "pooled just east of the Grand Canyon, feeding a vibrant ecosystem."

Deep Dive & References

Brightcast Impact Score (BIS)

This article details a new scientific discovery regarding the ancient origins of the Grand Canyon, providing new evidence for a long-debated hypothesis. While the discovery itself doesn't directly solve a problem, it represents a significant advancement in geological understanding. The impact is primarily intellectual and long-lasting, contributing to scientific knowledge.

Hope21/40

Emotional uplift and inspirational potential

Reach11/30

Audience impact and shareability

Verification20/30

Source credibility and content accuracy

Moderate
52/100

Local or limited impact

Start a ripple of hope

Share it and watch how far your hope travels · View analytics →

Spread hope
You
friendstheir friendsand beyond...

Wall of Hope

0/20

Be the first to share how this story made you feel

How does this make you feel?

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Connected Progress

Sources: Smithsonian Smart News

More stories that restore faith in humanity