Skip to main content

Why planets around binary stars almost never survive

Exoplanets around binary stars are rare, despite their abundance. Physicists now uncover the reason behind this puzzling celestial phenomenon.

2 min read
Berkeley, United States
7 views✓ Verified Source
Share

Most stars in the galaxy come in pairs, orbiting each other through space. You'd think that would mean plenty of planets with two suns — like Tatooine from Star Wars. Instead, they're vanishingly rare. Astrophysicists at UC Berkeley and the American University of Beirut have figured out why: Einstein's theory of gravity is actively destroying them.

Of the 4,500 known exoplanet-hosting stars, only 14 confirmed planets orbit binary star systems. That's roughly 0.3%. For comparison, about 10% of single stars host planets. The discrepancy is so stark that tight binaries — stars orbiting each other in less than seven days — have virtually no planets at all. It's not that planets don't form around binary stars. It's that they don't stick around.

How Relativity Clears the Field

When two stars orbit each other, they pull on any nearby planet, warping its orbit into an increasingly elongated ellipse. This orbital stretching is called precession — the same wobble you see in a spinning top as it slows down. Normally, this would be a slow, gradual process. But general relativity speeds things up dramatically.

Wait—What is Brightcast?

We're a new kind of news feed.

Regular news is designed to drain you. We're a non-profit built to restore you. Every story we publish is scored for impact, progress, and hope.

Start Your News Detox

As the two stars gradually spiral closer together over time (due to gravitational waves they emit), their own precession rate accelerates. Meanwhile, the planet's precession rate slows. When these two rates match — when they resonate — something catastrophic happens. The planet's orbit becomes wildly stretched. It swings dangerously close to one star, then far away from both. "Either the planet gets very, very close to the binary, suffering tidal disruption or being engulfed by one of the stars, or its orbit gets significantly perturbed to be eventually ejected from the system," said Mohammad Farhat, the UC Berkeley researcher who led the study.

A step-by-step explanation for why planets that orbit a double star eventually enter an unstable orbit and disappear from the system.

The math is brutal. Farhat and co-author Jihad Touma calculated that general relativistic effects would destroy eight out of every ten planets around tight binaries. Most wouldn't just drift away — they'd be consumed by their host stars or flung violently into space.

This explains the observation that's been puzzling astronomers since the Kepler and TESS missions started cataloging exoplanets. Kepler found roughly 3,000 eclipsing binary stars. If planets formed around binaries at the same rate they form around single stars, we should have found about 300 planets in these systems. We found 14.

A Cosmic Balancing Act

What's striking is that general relativity isn't always a planet-killer. Touma notes that the same relativistic effects that destabilize planets around binary stars actually stabilize Mercury's orbit in our own solar system, preventing it from being scattered into chaos. "General relativity is stabilizing systems in some ways and disturbing them in other ways," he said.

The researchers are now exploring whether this same mechanism affects planets around other exotic systems — binary pulsars and supermassive black holes. The work suggests that Einstein's century-old equations continue to shape the architecture of planetary systems in ways we're only now beginning to understand.

63
HopefulSolid documented progress

Brightcast Impact Score

This article presents a novel scientific explanation for the rarity of 'Tatooine-like' planets orbiting binary star systems, based on the effects of general relativity. While the topic may not be deeply emotionally inspiring, the article provides good evidence and details from scientific sources, suggesting a reasonably high level of hope, reach, and verification.

23

Hope

Solid

17

Reach

Solid

23

Verified

Strong

Wall of Hope

0/50

Be the first to share how this story made you feel

How does this make you feel?

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

Connected Progress

Share

Originally reported by UC Berkeley News · Verified by Brightcast

Get weekly positive news in your inbox

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Join thousands who start their week with hope.

More stories that restore faith in humanity